Democratic Party moves to boot Crawford
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
Sep 28, 2012 | 7387 views | 9 9 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rick Crawford
Rick Crawford
slideshow
The Democratic Party of Georgia will take steps to remove state Rep. Rick Crawford from the ballot, after the Cedartown Democrat announced he intends to switch parties if he is re-elected in November.

The party’s executive committee met Thursday night and “voted unanimously to accept his obvious resignation from the party,” committee member Wendy Davis of Rome said.

“We haven’t finished the legal research, and we know he can’t be replaced at this late date, but he is no longer our nominee,” Davis said.

Crawford has held the House District 16 seat since 2007, taking over when Democrat Bill Cummings of Rockmart retired after 26 years as Polk County’s representative.

He’s facing a challenge in the Nov. 6 election from Republican Trey Kelley, a 25-year-old law student and director of marketing for W.C. Brooks Co. who chaired Gov. Nathan Deal’s 2010 campaign in Polk County.

Crawford’s removal would leave Kelley the sole candidate for the seat — a situation Davis said is immaterial.

“It looks like it’s going to be won by a Republican either way,” she said.

Crawford said he felt announcing his intention to switch parties ahead of the vote is “the honest way to go about it.”

“It’s hardly going to come as a shock to anyone who has paid attention to me and seen the positions I’ve taken,” he said.

The district was redrawn to cover all of Polk County and parts of southwestern Bartow and northern Haralson counties. Prior to that, it covered Polk and a southern sliver of Floyd County including Cave Spring.

Crawford was unopposed for re-election in 2010, but he beat out Republican Bob Culver by a scant 182-vote spread in 2008 — and both Haralson and Bartow counties lean heavily Republican.

Political advantage, however, is not the reason he’s making the switch, Crawford contends.

“It’s pretty apparent my philosophy and the philosophy of the Democratic Party have been growing farther and farther apart. And it’s not because I’ve changed,” he said. “When I found out they were coming out in support of gay marriage, I said ‘who am I kidding, that’s not my party.’”

Crawford said he’ll let others debate the political value of his move but, to him, it’s an inevitable change.

“The philosophical divide was too great to be bridged,” he said. “I’ve never been a party line voter but I’m very consistent. I’ve always been pro-life and pro-gun. It’s very clear where I’m coming from.”
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
DannyBuck
|
November 16, 2012
Great move by the Democratic party. This man has never been an advocat of worker's rights, only his own agenda. Perfect fit for repubicans and corporate America.
Trelicious
|
November 16, 2012
Such a timely response. LOL Sure Hope that Dukakis wins.
LiedToAgainAndAgain
|
November 17, 2012
What a Democratic response, as to "worker's rights." As, evidently, a Democrat, which is your preference, Twinks, Ding Dongs, Or Ho Ho's?

Hostess employee's chose to follow after the Big Union bosses, and look what it got them...A pink slip, which would only be popular to wear in the Land of Pelosi in San Fran.
Ihatepolitics
|
October 01, 2012
The sad fact is that most voters make their choice on the basis of whether or not there's an R or a D next to the candidate's name. If Crawford had changed party affiliation earlier and run as a Republican, the same people who voted against Crawford in previous cycles would vote for him now. If you don't believe me, ask 10 voters in Crawford's district (or any district for that matter) who their elected state representative is. You'll be lucky if two people know.
GNATpacROB
|
October 01, 2012
GNAT PAC and the GOP are pushing for Desperate Rick to drop out as well. See for yourselves at http://www.DesperateRick.com
Ihatepolitics
|
October 01, 2012
The Desperate Rick page you direct readers to states that the GNAT PAC is not "affiliated with any candidate or candidate's committee" and yet the GNAT PAC website contains the following statements on its Endorsements page:

"We are targeting two races this fall election — one House seat and one Senate seat — that are currently occupied by Democrat incumbents. The two candidates vying to replace them will enact conservative reforms immediately under the Gold Dome and will be best for Georgia’s future.

Our support for their candidacies is independent of their campaigns."

Now I understand from this that you're not being paid by the campaigns to endorse these candidates, but you hardly sound independent of their campaigns since you're essentially providing them free ads. If you want to support a candidate or a party, fine, but why hide behind the mantle of impartiality and independence?
wish2010
|
September 29, 2012
An honest and honorable man! People with his strong character never last long in the political arena. Their honesty eventually leads to their defeat. The liars, thieves and corrupted seem to get re-elected time after time with the full support of their particular party.
Trelicious
|
September 29, 2012
I do not know the man, but I agree with your premise wish2010. With few exceptions we have the politicians, laws and economy that we deserve. We are quickly becoming a stupid, dependent people. There is plenty of evidence for that.

It is just my personal opinion that the nation is divided about 50/50 between those who want leaders who do the right things and those who want leaders who give them free stuff. I'd love to see a study comparing the disability rate of Americans today vs. the disability rate of Americans the day WWII ended. I'm guessing the disability rate is much higher now. Why? Because disability = free money. Have babies and refuse to work? We will pay you. Anytime we pay for a behavior, the behavior will increase. Don't want to work? Free food. Spend your days hanging out on the street corner? Free phone.

Want to keep the money you earn? Heartless, racist pig.

Obama and the GimmeGimme Party are fortunate that the 50/50 Productive/Leech society is divided within the electoral college in a manner that benefits the Leech.
appalucy
|
September 28, 2012
This has been mumbled by a few Floyd County candidates. Might as well get it out in the open!
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.