LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Georgia House Bill 140 offers school choice
by Rick Gilbert, Armuchee, Georgia GOAL Scholarship Program Inc.
Feb 27, 2013 | 1297 views | 4 4 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Say “yes” to parent choices and “no” to defenders of the status quo.

A key problem with the debate about K-12 education in America is the absolute inability of public school defenders to find any merit in providing financially struggling parents with more options for educating their children. This attitude was reflected in staff writer Lauren Jones’ recent article “House Bill 140 would boost education tax credits.”

As the Board Chairman of Georgia GOAL Scholarship Program, Inc., Georgia’s largest student scholarship organization, I appreciate having the opportunity to set the record straight.

First, Ms. Jones’ article failed to quote any parents from the approximately 10,000 families across Georgia to whom student scholarships have been awarded. Surely, those quotes have as much, even more, relevance to the debate than the extensive ones offered in the article from a single school choice opponent who is the “research coordinator” for a group of “parents, students and educators” dedicated to spending even more taxpayer money on public schools.

Instead of pouring money into the government-run education system, we should celebrate the fact that, in exchange for a state income tax credit, private individuals and corporations are contributing their hard-earned money to SS0s that, by awarding K-12 scholarships to deserving families, are forcing public schools, to actually compete for their customers.

In fact, because the average GOAL scholarship awarded is $3,800 and the average amount the state spends on educating a child in a local public school s approximately $4,700, each scholarship awarded by GOAL saves the state $900. Plus, even though a scholarship recipient leaves the public school system, the local school system still receives the same revenue generated by the local property taxes.

Of course, unlike as written in the article, this is not a “diversion” of money from the state. As the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 2011, these contributions are like any other charitable contributions for which the state provides relief from taxation.

Since 2008, when the Georgia Education Expense Credit program was enacted, at least 25,000 taxpayers have contributed to SSOs, thereby providing low and middle income parents with a “helping hand” in securing a better education for their children. Perhaps this is what scares the defenders of the status quo in public education-which thousands of Georgians realize that it is unfair to deny children access to the educational choices that best suit their needs.

HB 140 would increase the annual cap on available education expense credits. I encourage our state legislators to raise the cap and improve SSO transparency, but without increasing government regulation over the independent schools participating in the program.

Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
MikeLReynolds
|
March 02, 2013
Everyone in our society benefits from and has a responsibility to support free public education. It is one of the first institutions established in the US and a pillar of democracy.

Taxpayers are free to pay for and attend private schools; all persons are eligible for charitable income tax deductions at the state and federal levels for gifts to private or public schools. But, those gifts cannot pay the tuition of their child.

HB140 is a tax credit that allows those already abundantly blessed to divert public dollars to their personal benefit at the expense of middle class students. It is a scam not worthy of the leadership of our state; they should be ashamed.

The stated purpose of HB140 was to enable low-income students in public schools to attend a private school if they wished.

But, for some reason legislators made it illegal to release information about the scholarships awarded, so the effectiveness of the program is unknown.

Perhaps Mr. Gilbert will release an audited financial report of GOAL showing the expenses for staff of the scholarship organization as well as the breakdown of financial need of the students who moved from public schools to private schools.

HB140 is an example of the corrupting influence on legislators of those with money. This law increases inequality in our society, which now has lower upward mobility than any of the modern economies in Europe.

Legislation favoring the wealthy, like HB140, is one of the reasons for loss of hope among Americans.

Michael L. Reynolds

Rome

wish2010
|
March 02, 2013
Absolutely correct Mr. Reynolds.
alpharettamom
|
February 27, 2013
Indeed, time to get some facts straight about this voucher program. The Tax Credit scholarship program in Georgia, unlike the other 15 similar programs in the country, does not require any recipient to demonstrate that they are "financially struggling."GOAL states on it's website that the average family gross adjusted income is $26k - it's partner schools state the guideline is $88K for 2012.Who is telling the truth? Please explain how anyone - a corporation or an individual, is sacrificing their "hard earned" dollars to this program when they are getting a 100% tax credit? No one is sacrificing anything - in fact - Pay It Forward SSo advertises to it's corporate sponsors that they can actually make money by taking an additional Federal tax deduction - they make money. In tax credits of course. In addition, how can anyone claim that the state is saving money when the program does not require an applicant to have ever attended a public school. Shall I go on to to outline how the SSO's are wasting tax payer dollars with their ridiculous fees? The program is unaudited? Fraud is rampant? If this program is your alternative to our "government run schools", please go back to the drawing board.
LimitGovernment
|
February 27, 2013
BAM!

Tuition at Darlington $18'700.00 Books Meal Plan Technology Fee Sports

Per Pupil Cost FCS $9'500.00

I can either pay the state $1000.00 towards this SSO, or I can simply pay the state. There are no such things as earmarks within the general fund. I'm pretty sure there is a deduction for State Taxes on your federal form.

I think this is great for low cost day schools that offer financial aid to supplement tuition. But at the end of the day, this could be $80million earmarked for Public Education Charter Schools and traditional schools.

My philosophy is that financial aid is need based or scholarship is merit based. But to publicly subsidized private tuition is out of the box thinking, but is slightly misguided. Your almost guaranteeing a revenue stream for some select schools.

I think Earl Erhart is out of his mind.... This isn't Limited Government.

I agree with Alpharetta Mom

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.