MALDEF and GALEO join lawsuit in order to defend voting rights act
Jul 15, 2010 | 1015 views | 0 0 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Today, the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials (GALEO) filed legal papers opposing an attempt by the State of Georgia to implement new voter registration procedures that discriminate against minority voters. Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) represents GALEO in the legal effort, according to a press release.

The case, filed by the State of Georgia, seeks permission from the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC to impose voter registration procedures that the U.S. Justice Department has concluded are flawed and discriminatory. In the alternative, Georgia asks the federal court to declare unconstitutional key provisions of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. GALEO has requested to intervene in the case to defend voting rights of Georgia Latinos and the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act.

“This lawsuit seeks to strip away vital protections for minority voters,” explained Nina Perales, MALDEF Southwest Regional Counsel and lead lawyer for GALEO in the intervention. “MALDEF will continue to oppose discriminatory voter registration procedures, and also defend the Voting Rights Act, a law that has provided the Latino community with greater access to the political process.”

“The purpose of today’s action is to defend access to the polls for all voters,” stated Jerry Gonzalez, Executive Director of GALEO. “The State of Georgia has had a historical pattern of discriminatory practices against minorities, which has blocked access to the voting booths. As such, Georgia is subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. In this particular case, the State of Georgia has failed to demonstrate that the proposed voter verification procedures do not discriminate against minority communities,” added Gonzalez.

“We do not believe Georgia has lived up to its legal obligations to protect and to ensure equitable access to all voters, including minority voters. In addition, we believe these proposed changes demonstrate the need to uphold the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in order to protect access to the polls. GALEO intends to work in a bi-partisan fashion to ensure Georgia can look at best-practices policy alternatives to protect voter access,” continued Gonzalez.

The case, State of Georgia v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It seeks judicial preclearance of new voter registration procedures adopted by Georgia and in the alternative challenges Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act – the law that requires certain states and local governments that have a history of racial discrimination in voting to secure approval of changes in their election laws by the federal government.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.