Floyd votes no, but Ga. OKs charter measure
by Staff, Morris News Service reports
Nov 07, 2012 | 7252 views | 10 10 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Floyd and Chattooga voters broke with the state majority Tuesday, turning thumbs down on the controversial charter schools amendment.

The amendment passed in Bartow County, and had 58.32 percent of the vote statewide with 151 of the 159 counties reporting.

That means the state gets the last word on approving public schools organized by private individuals.

In Floyd County, 12,877 voted yes to the change and 18,590 weighed in with a resounding no.

Chattooga County also voted no, 4,236 to 3,202. Bartow voters favored the amendment, 18,839 to 15,673, although there were still some absentee ballots to be counted as of midnight.

The second ballot question — a straightforward amendment to let three government agencies sign multi-year contracts to get better deals on building leases — passed with 63.57 percent of the vote statewide.

In Floyd County, voters turned thumbs down, 17,071 to 13,123.

Bartow said no, 20,267 to 12,620 with some absentee ballots still uncounted.

Chattooga’s vote was closer: 3,663 in favor and 3,459 against.

There was no organized opposition.

The charter schools amendment, however, brought out organized campaigns on both sides of the issue.

It gives state appointees authority to grant operating charters to taxpayer-funded schools started by individuals, even if the locally elected school board objected.

Families for Better Public Schools raised more than $1.85 million, mostly from out-of-state conservatives devoted to school-choice initiatives around the country.

The opposition, Vote SMART! NO To State-Controlled Schools! only raised $123,000, all from within the state and mostly from school administrators and their vendors.

Before the votes were counted Tuesday, both sides were optimistic.

“We tried to focus our campaign on Georgia’s students and providing more educational opportunities so that our state can be more competitive for jobs and investment,” said Bert Brantley, spokesman for Families. “We have let charter-school students and parents tell their stories of how having a public-school option has helped their families.”

On the other hand, Jane Langley, campaign manager for Vote SMART, offered her desire that now attention would shift to other education issues.

“We hope that all the energy and money spent on this campaign can now be applied where it matters most — advocating to restore funding to the classrooms and a quality education for all Georgia children,” she said. “The winners will be all of Georgia.”

Even the wording of the amendment’s description on the ballot sparked controversy, with one group of opponents filing suit and another asking the U.S. Department of Justice to seek a voter-fraud case over it.

Political observers say it could have figured in the outcome.

“The wording will have some impact but likely not more than a point,” said pollster Matt Towery, CEO of InsiderAdvantage.

Charles Bullock, political science professor at the University of Georgia, notes that most voters don’t study ballot issues, especially when neither side has the millions of dollars needed for a television campaign to raise awareness.

“Many, I suspect, use a brief rule of thumb. If the word ‘tax’ appears in the statement, they vote against the proposal,” he said. “Beyond that, the pattern in recent years has been for amendments to secure approval. The language in the preface to the charter-school amendment can’t hurt and may improve its prospects for adoption.”

Election results showed that rural voters opposed the amendment while it won support in cities and suburbs where most of the charter schools have been organized.

Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
acct101
|
November 08, 2012
Voter, as one of your “committee women”, I just monitor the site occasionally. Proud of the work we did locally for 2012 and planning for 2014 and beyond. You and others have lost the ability to bother me with your pronouncements. Anyway, it’s all just words floating in cyberspace. Enjoy yourself!

FormerRomerJr, I believe there will be many “told you so” moments in the next four years.
jprhedd
|
November 07, 2012
Unfortunately people do not understand the benefits of charter schools. Not all schools but several specialty charter schools would have been helpful. (Science, arts, etc) Of course, administrators would have to watched carefully since many hands would be grasping at the money. Could it work? Sure. There are plenty of crooks in the public education field.
Ihatepolitics
|
November 07, 2012
If there are "plenty of crooks in the public education field," how will adding a new batch of even better funded crooks to the mix bring about accountability? If our present state government is not preventing graft and corruption now, why should they punish the people funding their campaigns?

I am proud of Floyd and Chattooga voters for seeing through the glossy rhetoric of Amendment 1 ads, and I hope our newly elected representative Eddie Lumsden, who opposed the measure, will serve as a watchdog to curb profiteering and the undermining of our public school system.
Trelicious
|
November 07, 2012
I hope in the long run it raises teachers' salaries. They only average a little over $50,000 a year now in Floyd County and we all know that the more we pay them the more our students will learn.
anabelle_lee
|
November 07, 2012
I hope that was sarcasm Tre. If not, you got the most warped thinking of any public teat suckler I have seen so far. If anything, it will probably lower salaries and benefits to that of the private sector which is why it didn't pass in Floyd County
Trelicious
|
November 07, 2012
Those public teat suckers got your man re-elected, you should not let them know how you really feel about them. You'll need them again next election.

annabelle's logic is as follows: Those who actually provide a service while acting as government agents and receive a paycheck, are leeches. Those who sit on their rear and get free healthcare, food stamps, etc are fine people. Those who risk their lives arresting annabelle's family are leeches, those who take from the working and give to the bums, fine people.

To put it shortly, she's a Democrat.
anabelle_lee
|
November 07, 2012
Tre he's not my man. He must be yours because you are one of the 47 percent that doesn't pay taxes that Romney was talking about so you better be glad that he was reelected.

Hey Jr. I really got under your skin didn't I. Lol. Did you ever answer my question.
Trelicious
|
November 07, 2012
Actually he now works in the Atlanta area, so we make enough money to pay taxes. Add in the second jobs, and we pay a nice tidy sum of taxes. We don't have an Obama-phone, we're not one of the millions of people who get a plastic card entitling them to free food every month, and we actually pay for health insurance, deductibles, co-pays and out-of-pocket costs. We've never asked Uncle Obama to save us by taking money from one with a better job and giving it to us "Just Cuz We Want It". We've never voted based on who promises to give us the most free stuff. We've never voted based on the candidate's race, religion (or lack of), abortion stance, or some slip of the tongue. you know all those important things that the media focuses 99% of their coverage on.

My husband's job does not entail harassing poorly paid court clerks or blaming others for the criminal failures of their families. He does not spend every waking moment posting on websites. It's no wonder you can't stand his type :D

I know your type. You blame the failures in your life on others. That's fine, it's becoming the American way. Are you and Voter roommates?
anabelle_lee
|
November 07, 2012
You just don't get it do you Tre. You do all that with a goverment funded job so you are actually not paying taxes.
Trelicious
|
November 07, 2012
Did you know most larger companies have government contracts? What about when a government employee eats at Schroeders for lunch. Is the owner sponging off taxpayers? What about when a government employee puts gas in his car, what happens to the tax on fuel, and does the gas station owner need to refuse my money because it's government money and he doesn't want to be a leech?

Your idea that government employees should not pay taxes is a great one. Thanks for your input.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.