Natural gas drillers turning to Georgia
by Dan Chapman, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Mar 11, 2013 | 4924 views | 21 21 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DALTON — Trillions of cubic feet of natural gas believed to lie below the hills of Northwest Georgia have remained virtually untouched and unwanted — until now.

Shale gas drilling is slowing across the country, but a handful of companies are poking around this corner of the state looking for the next natural gas “play.” If they succeed, Georgia could join the ranks of states reaping jobs, revenue and fears of environmental damage from energy production, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has learned.

It has been at least 30 years since Georgia — which has never produced a drop of oil or natural gas — has seen as much exploratory activity.

An Oklahoma-based company that leased 7,500 acres of land outside Dalton has two test wells in place and plans another nearby. Seventy miles away, near Cave Spring, a Texas oil, gas and development conglomerate plans a deeper well.

At least three other companies have recently researched the so-called Conasauga shale field, a 20-by-100 mile swath of farm and forest that runs from Alabama across Georgia and into Tennessee.

Georgia joins Tennessee and North Carolina as Southern states newly popular with wildcatters and major gas and oil companies.

“They know that there’s gas here,” said Rick Huggins, whose mineral rights lease outside Dalton was recently re-upped by the Oklahoma explorers. “But it’s all speculation. It’s like old Forrest Gump said, ‘You don’t know what you got until you open up that box of chocolates,”

The timing is odd. A gas glut and low prices make extraction economically unfeasible in many parts of the country. Production has throttled down in Pennsylvania, Texas and Kentucky.

Northeast Alabama raged with gas fever until 2010 when low prices and technological hurdles cooled the interest. Georgia doesn’t have the infrastructure — the trucks, tanks, pipes and refineries — needed to transform a liquid into a fuel to heat homes and cook food.

Oil and gas men are gamblers, though, looking months or years ahead. Energy analysts predict natural gas prices will rise again as it increasingly replaces coal and other petroleum products. And where there’s gas, there’s usually oil and other money-making liquids nearby.

Jerry Spalvieri likes the odds.

A wildcatter, or independent explorer, Spalvieri is betting maybe $2 million that the Conasauga field in Northwest Georgia will give up liquid riches.

“You have to be a gambler because I look back and see where we lost a couple of hundred thousand dollars here and there and realized we shouldn’t have done that,” said Spalvieri, CEO of Buckeye Exploration of Chandler, Okla. “But the fun is in the hunt.”

Bounty unclaimed

In Alabama, the Conasauga shale field contains 625 trillion cubic feet of gas, according to Bill Thomas, a geologist who taught at the University of Kentucky and Georgia State. A similar amount could be underground in Northwest Georgia, he added.

Wildcatters have poked around the state since the 1950s. Georgia officials in 1958 were so determined to create an oil industry that they offered a $1 million reward for the first gusher. The bounty, since reduced to $250,000, is still unclaimed.

Most drilling took place on the Coastal Plain, below the so-called Gnat Line that runs from Columbus to Augusta. Between 1903 and 1979, according to the Bureau of Land Management, 163 wells had been drilled in Georgia.

“All wells have been dry,” the BLM said in 2008. “No oil and gas wells are forecast to be drilled in Georgia in the next 10 years.”

Spalvieri received Permit Nos. 166 and 167 for his test wells outside Dalton in March 2010. Alabama, with on- and off-shore gas and oil wells, has issued 16,700 permits since 1945, according to the state’s oil and gas board.

Drawn by the geologic similarities embedded in the Conasauga formation, Spalvieri investigated Georgia in 2007. Within two years Buckeye and a partner had leased 7,500 acres of mineral rights from 130 landowners. Hundreds of acres remain under contract. The leases allow unlimited drilling on the property.

“Nobody was very optimistic about it, including the state. It was like I was being a bother to them,” said Spalvieri. “But it just staggers me that the largest land area in the East had never had a producing oil or gas well.”

Buckeye narrowed its search to two properties about seven miles northeast of Dalton. They began drilling in the Good Hope community in late 2010, but stopped after a few hundred feet once rivers of water intervened.

Buckeye drilled 5,065 feet at the other well a few miles away. They needed to go deeper. Salvieri will soon bring in another rig to reach 9,000 feet. He’ll also re-engineer his first well and dig another test well.

“It’s rank wildcat. There’s very little known about the gas in the area,” said Spalvieri, a petroleum geologist whose company has dug more than 250 wells — and hit the jackpot a half-dozen times — across Oklahoma and Tennessee. “But I’m really encouraged by the structure and some of the things we’ve encountered.”

At least three other companies are interested. Forestar, a publicly traded Texas real estate, timber, oil and gas company, controls mineral rights for 67,000 acres in Floyd and Chattooga counties. In all, Forestar owns nearly 600,000 acres of oil and gas mineral rights in Texas, Louisiana, Alabama and Georgia, its website says.

The company expects to start drilling in Cave Spring in May, according to a state permit. The planned well even has a name: John Wayne-Mudcreek No. 1. At 14,000 feet, it would be one of the deepest in Georgia. Forestar declined comment.

Jim Kennedy, the state’s geologist, says another company is considering the shale gas fields of the Mesozoic Basin that covers 60 percent of the Coastal Plain in South Georgia.

Georgia’s neighbors to the north aren’t wasting time either. Regulators in Tennessee and North Carolina are updating drilling and fracking rules. The Chattanooga Free Press reported earlier this month that a half-dozen drilling companies are considering mineral rights leases in Hamilton County bordering Georgia.

A natural gas industry in Georgia could bring the state jobs and tax revenue.

“It would change the whole dynamics of the state economy, but it all depends on the scale of production,” UGA economist Jeff Humphreys said. “Georgia has always been an energy consumer, not a producer. This could prove a counter-weight to the damage done to the state economy whenever energy prices rise.”

Northwest Georgia, whose flooring industry was hit hard by the recession, could use a new industry. Dalton’s unemployment rate remains stubbornly high at 11.3 percent.

A few Georgians already benefit from mineral lease payments. The big bucks come if Buckeye or Forestar hits a gas gusher. Property owners would receive royalty payments equivalent to one-eighth of the market price of gasoline.

Fred Mayfield, a Dalton CPA and gentleman farmer with cows, horses and 175 acres of forests and pastures, doesn’t really need the riches that one day could flow from his Buckeye well. “I’m pretty comfortable now,” he said. “But I suspect if they strike gas or oil it might affect my children’s lives.”

Industry re-energized

Natural gas production nationwide was in decline until 2005 when technology — horizontal drilling and the hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, of prehistoric rock to release the gas —re-energized the industry. Fracking makes it easier — and cheaper — to reach gas wedged between prehistoric rock thousands of feet below the surface.

Critics say chemicals and water pumped underground can leach into groundwater. Buckeye and Forestar, according to the state’s geologist, don’t have any near-term plans to frack. Long-term is a different matter and would require permission from the state.

Environmental groups, including the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), were unaware of the renewed interest in northwest Georgia’s natural gas field. The SELC is challenging new fracking rules in Tennessee and proposals to drill on public land in Alabama.

By the summer of 2008, a record 1,600 natural gas rigs had been planted from Oklahoma to Pennsylvania. Prices peaked at $12 per thousand cubic feet. The industry was running and gunning and carving out new plays, including in Alabama on the western leg of the Conasauga shale field. Major producers invested tens of millions of dollars, drilled 18 productive wells, compressed the gas and put it in a pipeline. They sucked 187 million cubic feet of gas from the ground, according to the Alabama oil and gas board.
Comments
(21)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
opinionatedlady
|
March 16, 2013
Saving a few fricking dollars on your gas bill is not going to matter when you can't even drink the water, or your family members are dying of cancer,ect. Really, you would really rather save a few bucks? Then go solar! Go wind! Destroying our ecosystem and poisining our water supply is not worth any amount of savings on a gas bill!
opinionatedlady
|
March 13, 2013
I cannot believe the ignorance of people. This comment section should be filled with outcrys of NO! I am not fearmongering as suggested by El Tiante, whom I suspect is a player in this move, I am someone who knows enough about this process to know, and did my own research when I first heard of fracking, I am positive this act is not only damaging to our rescources it is imperative to the health and welfare of anyone in the area of the fracking. Please people do your own research, google at the very least, but for God's sake don't just sit there and do nothing while this travesty bounces around in the minds of those who could care less about anything other than making some money off natural gas.
ElTiante
|
March 13, 2013
Gas Drilling Is Called Safe in New York

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/nyregion/hydrofracking-safe-says-ny-health-dept-analysis.html?_r=0

You really don't know what you're talking about, its's just that simple. You're spreading lies and misinformation.

As to your other unfounded accusation, I'm a regular citizen and homeowner here in Rome. I'd like a better, richer life for me and my family and a great way of achieving that is lower energy costs.

Lowering energy costs makes ALL of us richer and it makes US manufacturing more competitive. Producing our own energy employs American and makes us less dependent on hostile,unstable regimes. Taxes and royalties from domestic energy production lower individual tax burdens.

Natural gas produces a fraction of the CO2 of coal and has no sulfur or mercury emissions. US CO2 output has fallen to mid 1990s levels, largely thanks to increased use of natural gas.

Natural gas is clean, safe and efficient. We have centuries worth of natural gas supply and we'd doing ourselves and our children a great disservice not use it.
Ihatepolitics
|
March 13, 2013
Dear El Tiante, thank you for the NYT article that so clearly exposes the error of your position (apparently you read only the title). The article contains many explanations of bias and incomplete analysis in the New York study. Here's the most positive statement about the study: "The assessment obtained by The Times finds that fracking can be done safely within the regulatory system that the state has been developing for several years." Pray tell, what regulatory system has the state of Georgia (you know, the place where we live) undertaken? The Code of Georgia (O.C.G.A. § 12-4-1) charges the Environmental Protection Division with promoting mining, not protecting the environment from it. The only mention that I found about fracturing in the EPD's regulations (391-3-13-.11 Shooting, Perforating, Chemical Treatment or Fracturing of Wells) states that "If chemical treating, or fracturing results in irreparable injury to the well or to the oil or gas information, the Director may issue emergency orders for the well to be properly plugged and abandoned." No mention is made of what the Director must (or even may) do if fracturing harms the environment.

So you would have us trust these industry shills masquerading as environmental protectionists?
Ihatepolitics
|
March 13, 2013
P.S. No one is saying that natural gas is as harmful as coal. Jumping off a two-story building is safer than jumping off a ten-story building, but I'd rather take the stairs just the same.
ElTiante
|
March 13, 2013
Well, Ihatepolitics the same could be said of you. From the article:

The eight-page analysis is a summary of previous research by the state and others, and concludes that fracking can be done safely.

Again: Fracking can be done safely.

Ihatepolitics
|
March 13, 2013
The study states that fracking can be conducted safely with the safeguards that the state of New York has implemented over several years. There are those who disagree with this assumption, but I'll grant it to you for the sake of argument.

Georgia has implemented no such safeguards. I repeat, Georgia has implemented no safeguards, except to protect the mine itself. The regulation I cited above is from 1981.

The EPD that you apparently put so much trust is the same agency that visited Rome about 15 or 20 years ago when our drinking water smelled and tasted funny. The EPD reported that they didn't know what the substance was, but it was not harmful.
anabelle_lee
|
March 13, 2013
does anyone know exactly where in Cave Spring this will be
deadhorse
|
March 13, 2013
Hopefully in your living room.
opinionatedlady
|
March 11, 2013
Yes, Gasland, one cannot deny the facts presented in the documentary. Watch it, then do the research yourself. There is no resource worth this. We need to be looking in the direction of solar and wind, not raping the earth for gas production! It would take a pitiful sheep to be led to this and believe that if the government says it won't hurt that they are telling the truth! Don't be a sheep! Stand up and stop this before they start killing the land and the people!
opinionatedlady
|
March 11, 2013
quote: "Multiple studies, including Obama's EPA have not found any significant environmental risk to hydraulic fracturing.

This technology will offer America centuries of low cost, low carbon energy. It's simply foolish not to pursue this to the greatest possible extent.

Read more: RN-T.com - Natural gas drillers turning to Georgia " unquote

this is a typical statement of someone who is a sheep. It is not low cost, the cost of fracking is very high, in lives, and in lost resources. We want to keep Cave Springs water pristine as it is today. Not have it bubbling up chemicals and lighting on fire when you strike a match to it!
opinionatedlady
|
March 11, 2013
And pray tell, where would you, El Tiante, have them place the Toxic hydrofracking fluids that are injected into the ground? They want Cave Springs BECAUSE it IS a water source!
ElTiante
|
March 11, 2013
The well is question is 14 THOUSAND feet deep, that THOUSANDS of feet BELOW ground water.
ElTiante
|
March 11, 2013
With regards to those "Toxic hydrofracking fluids"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing#Fracturing_fluids

Typically, of the fracturing fluid 90% is water and 9.5% is sand with the chemical additives accounting to about 0.5%

You're and uninformed fear monger.
Ihatepolitics
|
March 13, 2013
El Tiante stated "The well is question is 14 THOUSAND feet deep, that THOUSANDS of feet BELOW ground water."

Are they using that new psychic mining technique that allows them to access the oil without actually penetrating the earth above it?
opinionatedlady
|
March 11, 2013


Fracking’s Four Biggest Biophysical Risks



There are five areas of concern, detailed in the research the doctors have collated, about the biophysical risks.

1. Radioactive wastewater



The higher levels of radioactive materials, released through drilling from Marcellus shale, exceed EPA’s maximum contaminant safety levels by 1,000-fold. Due to infrequent testing, it’s unlikely that radioactivity in public water would be detected prior to mass consumption, with exposure resulting in “anemia, cataracts, cancer, and increased mortality,” according to a CDC toxicological profiles report.



2. Radon



With radon exposure, the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S., the radon present in the shale will readily mix with the gas and travel with it via pipeline into the homes and businesses of its end users.

3. Smog



Exhaust from trucks and industrial equipment increases smog in both rural locations and travels downstate to impair air quality in regional urban environments.

4. Chemical contamination of drinking water

Over time, most well casings fail. When fracking fluids seep from them to connect with underground fissures, previously abandoned wells, and natural faults and fractures, the contaminants and methane can readily migration over long distances into underground water ways and fresh drinking water sources.

Five Main Systemic Obstacles to Protecting Health From Fracking



In addition to the biophysical vectors, is the overarching context for assessing, preventing or treating the resulting diseases. To make an accurate assessment, it’s necessary to consider:

1. The long latency of many illnesses



A higher incidence of asthma, cancer, heart disease and the effects of endocrine disruption on developing fetuses and children, due to contaminant exposure, only become evident over time. To prevent disease rather than incur its high human and economic costs, it’s best to intervene prior to exposure, rather than act in hindsight.

2. The lack of medical know-how

Conventional medicine does not recognize, no less treat, symptoms and illnesses resulting from increasing toxic chemicals exposures. Treatment of cancer and radiation-related conditions is a medical specialty.

3. The conflicts of interests affecting scientific findings



According to studies cited in a 2012 meeting presentation before the NY DEC, industry-funded studies can result in findings that “benefit sponsors, (are based on) poor study design, and (withhold) negative data from publication.”

Pages





A

A

A

Email

Print

Liked this article? Join our email list

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email





. .

.

opinionatedlady
|
March 11, 2013
No! People please put the word out, SAY NO TO FRACKING! Watch Gasland, it is not just propaganda, it is pure TRUTH! We do not want this, and Cave Springs is a water source, we don't want gas bubbling up in it, tainting the water! We don't want people to turn on their water and it be explosive!!!! SAY NO TO THIS!
ElTiante
|
March 11, 2013
Gasland, LOL

Multiple studies, including Obama's EPA have not found any significant environmental risk to hydraulic fracturing.

This technology will offer America centuries of low cost, low carbon energy. It's simply foolish not to pursue this to the greatest possible extent.
Ihatepolitics
|
March 20, 2013
Caro Tiante,

While it is true that what you call the "Obama EPA" is seeking to minimize the environmental risks from hydraulic fracturing, it is NOT true that they "have not found any significant environmental risk to hydraulic fracturing."

From the EPA:

Providing Regulatory Clarity and Protections against Known Risks

Although the national study should enhance our scientific knowledge, some concerns associated with overall natural gas and shale gas extraction, including hydraulic fracturing, are already well known. These operations can result in a number of potential impacts to the environment, including:

* Stress on surface water and ground water

supplies from the withdrawal of large volumes of water used in drilling and hydraulic fracturing;

* Contamination of underground sources of drinking water and surface waters resulting from spills, faulty well construction, or by other means;

* Adverse impacts from discharges into surface waters or from disposal into underground injection wells; and

* Air pollution resulting from the release of volatile organic compounds, hazardous air pollutants, and greenhouse gases.

Because natural gas development is increasing rapidly in many regions, prudent steps to reduce these impacts are essential now even as further research to understand potential risks continues.

Source: http://www2.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing#providing

You are either ignorant or fraudulent.

Ignorance can be cured by doing a little research before you speak.

Fraud can be cured by telling the truth.
FormerRomanJr.
|
March 20, 2013
The University of Tennessee is leasing out their land for fracking-Of course, those folks are hillbillies..New agreements were reached today regarding oversight,responsibility and outside input on these matters..
Ihatepolitics
|
March 20, 2013
From a practical point of view, FRJr., it is unlikely that opponents of fracturing will prevent all such efforts. What is necessary is have in place enough safeguards to minimize risk reasonably. According to another RN-T piece, environmentalists and drillers in several states have come up with programs that will provide such safeguards, whether voluntary as in some cases or mandatory as in others. My argument with the RN-T Editorial Board and El Tiante is that they apparently believe such regulations are unnecessary. I don't know about Tennessee, but it's fairly clear that the state of Georgia offers no such measures and is on the side of the drillers.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.