Regents, ‘Moms’ state gun opposition
by Walter C. Jones, Morris News Service
Mar 12, 2013 | 2747 views | 11 11 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ATLANTA – The Board of Regents released a statement Tuesday opposing legislation that would allow guns on college campuses, and a separate group is planning a rally to object to them in churches, bars and schools.

The groups are trying to stop House Bill 512 which passed the House of Representatives Thursday, just hours before the legislature’s internal deadline. Now the matter is pending in the Senate.

The House Public Safety & Homeland Security Committee rolled into one the several separate bills to relax various gun-control measures. Then the House passed it largely on a party-line vote.

“We firmly believe the current law promotes a safe learning environment for our students and working environment for our faculty and staff,” notes the four-sentence statement signed by Chancellor Hank Huckaby, the regents of the University System of Georgia and the presidents of the state’s 31 public colleges.

Huckaby testified against it in the House committee.

A group calling itself Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America is taking a more public tact. Jewish and Christian clergy are also scheduled to participate.

“As people of faith, we urge our elected leaders to reject the proliferation of guns in public places as advocated in HB512,” said the Rev. Gary Charles, pastor of Central Presbyterian Church across the street from the Capitol. “We call our worship spaces ‘sanctuaries’ as a reminder that this is where God’s people come to worship God and feel safe from the threat of gun violence.”

Legislators supporting the bill point to the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment as giving citizens the right to carry guns, arguing that rights should only be restricted under rare circumstances. They also challenge gun-control advocates’ contention that outlawing guns would make people safe by noting that murder is already illegal and that anyone willing to break that law won’t be stopped by a new one.

The Senate chairman of the Judiciary Non-Civil Committee where HB 512 is pending, Sen. Jesse Stone, R-Waynesboro, has scheduled a meeting for Wednesday afternoon, but the bill is not on the list for consideration.

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Termlimits
|
March 12, 2013
Woman exercises her 2nd amendment rights at the post office, finally expresses to her ex how she really feels.

Where is safe?
SeriouslyFolks
|
March 12, 2013
“We firmly believe the current law promotes a safe learning environment for our students and working environment for our faculty and staff,”

&

"Sanctuaries"

Really? Hello? I am quite sure the BOE & Faculty for Sandy Hook, didn't think that they had an unsafe environment.

Individuals willing to enter a school or house of worship with the intent to find an abundance of helpless victims want a weapons free zone. They are at best insane and at worst inherently evil, either way they are cowards. There is a reason why you don't have mass murders by a lone gunman in a police station. If Dawn Hochsprung had been armed when she lunged at Adam Lanza in violation of the weapon free zone policy, the tragedy would likely have been limited to his mom.
SeriouslyFolks
|
March 13, 2013
wheninrome

So you are in favor of a total gun ban?

No one is allowed to own them and you have a plan to destroy every privately, legally owned gun, how?

If I had someone with serious mental issues in my home, I would not keep guns there BUT you cannot legislate common sense.

Zero does not beat one if the one being dead prevents loss of many innocent lives or would you give the Saddam Hussein's of this world a warm fuzzy message to be nice?
bluekatana650
|
March 12, 2013
Does Rev. Gary Charles really believe that keeping law abiding licensed gun owners from carrying a firearm to church is going to ACTUALLY MAKE a church "safe from the threat of gun violence."?

If Rev. Charles feels that way, then he can still prohibit firearms at Central Presbyterian Church, where there are dozens of Georgia State Patrol officers right across the street. The churches should have the RIGHT to decide for themselves.

Other churches aren't located quite so close to local law enforcement, and need the security that a few members could provide.

TheSeer
|
March 12, 2013
This bill would not permit individual churches to prohibit firearms. The bill as written only permits those churches to remove the persons with firearms once they are on church property. It is one of the worst written bills in legislative history.
onemansthoughts
|
March 12, 2013
WWJD
Ihatepolitics
|
March 13, 2013
Would the 45% of RN-T readers who say you would take your guns to church please name the churches that you attend? It would help me in choosing a congregation.
onemansthoughts
|
March 12, 2013
If members of the House believe so strongly in "the US Constitution's Second Amendment as giving citizens the right to carry guns" in public places such as college campuses, churches, bars, and schools then why did they not also include the Capitol?
serpenttoe
|
March 12, 2013
onemansthoughts:

Excellent point! (Now get prepared to be attacked by the gun crazies who were lined up a mile long to get into the gun show at the Forum.)
SeriouslyFolks
|
March 12, 2013
Because they are guarded by ARMED security forces to protect them.
FormerRomanJr.
|
March 12, 2013
Guns are like parachutes-If you need one and don't have it-You'll likely never need another.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.