New radios didn't work perfectly in storm situation
by Jeremy Stewart, Staff Writer
Mar 20, 2013 | 5361 views | 11 11 comments | 27 27 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gordon Henderson
Gordon Henderson
slideshow
Monday’s storms had Floyd County emergency personnel out in full force as power outages and reports of wrecks and damage kept them busy throughout the night.

But the situation also provided another real-world test of the new countywide communications system, which came online in January.

While at the Rome Public Safety Committee meeting Tuesday morning, Rome-Floyd Fire Chief Gordon Henderson said they had some issues with the new system’s radios while responding to the influx of calls.

“The radios are supposed to be waterproof,” Henderson said. “But they did get wet and didn’t tend to work at all.”

Troy Brock, who was recently promoted to deputy chief, said there was a problem hearing calls on radios when they were wet.

Henderson said that while the rain caused a bit of a problem, the way some of the departments use them is an issue as well.

“We’re going to have to do some in-house training on them,” Henderson said. “In a storm like we had last night, we were still using them like we did the old system and it’s not set up like that.”

He said for the most part the $26.7 million system has worked as advertised with better inter-agency communication but there are “still a few bugs” to be worked out.

Henderson said they would be talking to Harris Communications, the company that designed the new system and manufactured the radios.

In other business, Rome Police Chief Elaine Snow filled in the committee on the new identification devices.

They were recently purchased with a $21,350 homeland security grant on behalf of the Georgia Emergency Management Agency.

The mobile fingerprint scanners will allow officers on patrol to obtain a person’s identification information, including outstanding warrants, by getting a fingerprint and transmitting it through an in-car Mobile Data Terminal.

Snow said they have to come up with a policy on how to use the new technology and train officers before it can be put to use.

Previous report
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Plugins
|
March 24, 2013
There's nothing wrong with the system and it is state of the art. State of hte art system being used by leaders with 1964 attitudes will always lead to trouble. Having 1000 different channels but having the same amount of dispatchers is an issue. In the toarnado the other day they put the entire county, public works police fire ems everyone on one channel. Made no sense. the two hospitals should provide there own dispatchers and that would solve tha tproblem. Forcing the old tymers to learn the system instead of complain about it and forc etheir people to complain about it would solve the problem. the system aint going away so either learn it or find another job.
hp7350
|
March 24, 2013
The system is fine. The problems are with the department heads of police, fire and EMS. Tthe department heads lack knowledge of how this system should be utilized and are unfamiliar with multi-channel usage nor do have they established protocols designed to use the system. Example: Fire has the ability to utilize tac channels to minimize main frequency usage but either due to incompetence or inability to move forward, they are still piling all communications on one channel. The system is designed to be adaptive and give departments flexibility without cramming everything down 911's throat. Another example: Floyd and Redmond EMS have been put on the same dispatch channel thereby increasing either departments radio traffic 100% or more. They should function on their independent EMS tac channels and keep the EMS channel open for 911 dispatch only. I encourage department heads to discuss this with other counties that utilize P25 systems and listen and learn.
dalton75
|
March 24, 2013
When all else fails, read the operator's manual.

Of course, you would have to be able to read above an 8th grade level which could be a challenge.

There has to be at least one person in the Floyd County or Rome City government that could sit down, read the manual, and make up an easy to understand booklet for all of the department heads so they might come up with way to use their new toys properly.
dumpcake
|
March 21, 2013
The entire system is a joke (an expensive one, at that) and has not worked properly since day 1.

There are numerous "dead" areas in the county where you can neither hear nor be heard. To top it all off, just as was stated in the article, this "cutting edge" technology is really being used exactly as the old system was. It hasn't done a single thing to enhance communications whatsoever.
radiohead2013
|
March 25, 2013
It seems that just a few apples go out of the way to try to down play the forward movement of our county. In the case Officer and the safety of the public are under attack. I wonder how many dead areas existed before the new system came on line? I suspect a lot. I wonder how many new jobs have been created in the county and city? Perhaps only a half dozen good paying positions. I wonder why the above stated "cutting edge" technologies are being ignored by some of the older apples in the complaint barrel?

Maybe we need to be suspicious of the old apples that seed to only look for the bad and embellish the negative. I know that they are heroes to our community and have given years of selfless service to our community. I do not question their integrity and value. But I do worry about officers that resist technology and function that is intended to protect their lives and the lives of the everyday citizen.

It is important that the technology of today become the power tools of those protecting and serving our community. May God and the people of Floyd County and the city of Rome bless these great men and women.

dalton75
|
March 20, 2013
That's what you get for using a federal government contractor. They always want more money to make it work correctly. The ongoing upkeep is a fortune also.

They could have bought satellite phones and paid the monthly charge for way less than the new radio system yearly maintenance cost and saved the 26 million.
squarecubed
|
March 20, 2013
Heads should roll because it didn't work perfectly? Thats just nuts. Ask that there far department how much it cost to add 1970 tecknowledgy to this here radio system with nasa engineering? that there far department demanded that their pagers be included in that there 26 gazilion dollar system. Thats right pagers. i here tale that what this is rilly about is the old guard hating a new system but the newere people love it.
WhisperontheWind
|
March 20, 2013
I seriously doubt that any system has ever been established that did not have some issues that needed to be worked out.
BBchord
|
March 20, 2013
$26.7 million system that fails. Heads should roll.
FormerRomanJr.
|
March 20, 2013
If they didn't perform as advertised-Return them and ask for a refund..If they don't cooperate, alert future customers and they'll soon refund your money or be out of business.
tullock
|
March 20, 2013
Quit your griping and line up with the lemmings for the next SPLOST.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.